Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Delay update ... "Extraordinary and excessive" delay - by the litigants ... Contest on costs ... Getting to grips with Qld industrial law takes time ... What is a "worker"? ... What is an "injury"? ... Justice Jenni frigging around ... Slow grind for earnest Circuiteer ... From judges' associate Ginger Snatch ... Read more >>

 

Politics Media Law Society


A biopsy on bias ... Darryl Rangiah and Oscar Wilde … A unity ticket … White flags at Ultimo … The Hyphen … BBC also on the ropes … Cease – FIRE … Why is Murdoch’s bias always wrong about everything? ... Read on >> 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

From the cutting room floor...Handsy Heydon goes to Perth ... Celebrity tour ... Conferenceville ... Dicey's job application speech from 2002 ... Other High Court judges mocked as "vegetables" ... Mason CJ ridiculed ... Speech bowdlerised for public consumption ... Courage of conviction MIA ... From our National Affairs Correspondent ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Walter Sofronoff v ACT Integrity Commission kicks off on Monday @ 10.15 am before Justice Abraham ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Sizzling in the Old Dart ... Story of the complaining law graduate ... Tattle Life brought to book ... Beckham family feud over royal gong ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's postcard ... Read more >> 

"What you are not being told by the media anywhere is that the death toll likely would not have been as high if it wasn't for DEI."

Charlie Kirk, American conservative and conspiracy theorist on the Texas floods ... The Charlie Kirk Show, July 9, 2025  Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeitgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Being chased by a dog called Rhetoric ... Justice Virginia Bell on rhetorical devices and barristering ... It seems to be a male thing ... Distractions from the truth ... Tulkinghorn asks, where would the bar be without bad rhetoric? ... September 14, 2012 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Untrustworthy opponents | Main | Deferred examination application »
Friday
Jun282013

I'm a loser

"Why are you here?" the judge asks ... Lessons from a run of losses ... Junior Junior is advised about the virtue of defeat 

THE first year or two of a junior junior's professional life is usually marked by a series of loser briefs.

Solicitors have no qualms in briefing a baby barrister on a matter that is a dog - the baby barrister is cheap and solicitors are saved from the ignominy of being downed. 

But for a junior junior trying to get their hit rate up, it is demoralising.

Nothing says defeat like a string of losing briefs, some of which involve being bawled out by judges for wasting their time.

This is part of the unending joy of early barristerial life.

So, I was relieved when I had Friday night drinks with my floor leader a few weeks ago to be given some reassuring advice. 

First, losing briefs are the bread and butter of junior practice. Secondly, solicitors don't actually expect you to win them (phew), and most losing briefs are lost regardless of who the barrister is.

This idea that a genius barrister never loses a case (à la Rake) is just that, an idea. There is no reality in it.

The barrister with the fanciest pants will lose a hospital pass just the same as a green reader with their first brief. 

After your eighth straight loss, this is a welcome reality.

On more than one occasion, I have been asked by an incredulous judge, "Why are you even here?" 

There is obviously a fine line between an arguable case and a case that is wasting the court's time. 

During a costs argument, after an unmitigated failure of a case, the judge refused to even consider our carefully explained rejection of a Calderbank offer as, "it should have been obvious to your instructing solicitor from the second he received the instructions in the case, that it was bound to lose".  

While I think this was harsh, it was followed by a good 15 minutes being told that all my arguments were bogus. 

Afterward, my opponent apologised to me - he was mortified at the dressing down I had received.

The good news is, if you manage to win one of these rubbish briefs (such as by default of your opponents, the lack of logic on the part of a famous magistrate or some snappy loophole you manage to run), then your solicitor will love you forever.

There is nothing like receiving an email from a client with an offer to kiss your feet.

But, most of the time you know you are heading into the arena for a bollocking and there is nothing you can do about it, except to practice your poker face and ensure a stiff gin is awaiting you in chambers.

That said, off I go as the next bollocking awaits.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.