SEARCH
Justinian News

Time's Up for Naughty Nathan ... Recommendation that horrible NSW solicitor be derolled ... Misuse of online funding campaigns ... Spraying ripe and abusive language ... Trolling Robert Beech-Jones ... So unfit and improper as to be beyond reeducation ... Anthony Kanaan reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society

Perils of the Defamatorium ... Lovely Linda Reynolds’ “victory” leaves her underwater … Politics, sex, law, and money … Injuries galore … The art of Tottling … Where’s the serious harm? … Trust me … Jurisdictional backwater ... Read more >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Act of gracelessness ... Kathleen Folbigg's miserable ex gratia payout ... Comparable awards in other miscarriage cases ... Weasel words from the NSW Premier ... Need for a proper system of compensation assessment ... Procrustes in a lather ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"I actually never saw the President in any type of massage setting. I never witnessed the President in any inappropriate setting in any way. The President was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects ... Trump was always very cordial and very kind to me. And I just want to say that I find, I admire his extraordinary achievement in becoming the president now."

Convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell interviewed by Trump's former lawyer Todd Blanche, now Deputy Attorney General ... July 25, 2025. Interviews released by DOJ, August 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Schmoozing and Betrayal ... Judge Water Softener rides into Integrityville mounted high on his horse ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... Unprecedented assistance to morals monitor ... Plenty to think about ... Court reporter Ginger Snatch files ... Read more >> 

 

 

Justinian's archive

The Tamil Times ... The corruption wars ... Blitzkrieg from The Australian's legal affairs man ... Campaigns to sink ICAC and 18C ... Battles lost in the trenches ... Where are they now? ... Extravagant fulminations ... From Justinian's Archive, April 8, 2017 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« The bold and the bashful | Main | Unreasonable suspicion »
Tuesday
Jul142015

Interns - throw off your chains

An oversupplied market where interns are asked to pay whopping fees to law firms ... When is an intern really an employee? ... Barely Legal embarks on an internship and wrestles with the "work thresholds"   

UNPAID internships are the new norm, which is an unfortunate development for young people seeking employment in the professions. 

Law students feel the pinch more acutely than most. Due to the well publicised oversupply of law graduates (as if we're produced on a factory floor), more often than not students are shoved into unpaid internships out of necessity.  

Law students also bear the brunt of some of the more challenging incarnations of market rationalism. 

Take, for example, the recent case of Adlawgroup - a start-up firm in Adelaide that plans to charge a fee of $22,000 to allow an intern to intern at the firm for two years. 

"For most employees the cost of the investment is $22,000 for the two year program. This cost includes the cost of the practicing certificate and the comprehensive continuing education program."

Welcome to the new way of getting a foot on the career escalator. 

If any nascent lawyers want to sample the wares of this exciting business model, Adlawgroup is still accepting applications through its website. 

Interns of the world unite 

Concerned about the traps for young players, I undertook my own unpaid internship. 

It turns out the Commonwealth Fair Work Ombudsman has my back. All I have to do is make sure my "employer" organisation doesn't breach certain thresholds of work, which may deem me worthy of a wage. 

What is the reason for the engagement? 

"If the work is more about being productive than about observation or learning, it is likely the intern is an employee."

This is simple enough - simply work less. This might come naturally to some, but not most law students, who are driven by a ravenous hunger to compete and win. 

In my current intern role I was told that I would be performing the work I otherwise do for money while studying. Some threshold. 

What is the significance to the organisation? 

"If the intern plays a role that is important in the organisation completing its work, the intern is more likely an employee."

Many of the internship programs in which young law students partake are conducted on a rolling stock basis. When old interns leave, new ones fill their place, continuing the same work. 

In some cases, such as the organisation for which I am currently an intern, if the steady trickle of interns were to shut off, the grunt work of the organisation would grind to a halt and so too major casework. The intern is a replaceable unpaid cog. 

Is the intern too productive in the organisation? Who gets the benefit of the internship? 

Interns get the benefit of a recommendation from the organisation, but they won't get a good recommendations if they aren't productive. 

The key to an internship is to work less

If the intern is too productive, they may meet a threshold of productiveness that dictates they are doing the work of an employee, and should be paid accordingly. If they ask to be paid, they get a bad recommendation. Such is life in an oversupplied graduate market. 

Interns have little recourse to pay-packets, little ability to protest, and little access to the law. But what about organised labour? What about uniting and throwing off our chains? 

When you're told by an Ombudsman that what you do isn't really labour, it becomes grievously apparent you don't have any chains to throw off. Perhaps a $22,000 intern fee is the next logical step. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.