Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

The law and its miracles ... Party allies selected for judicial elevation in Qld ... Justice Jenni Hill's brother ... More entries for the Golden Tortoise award ... Federal Court muddles the maths, again ... Theodora reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Rupert World ... Lord Moloch’s pal Doug the Diva – driving Washington spare … News UK’s model for unionism … What next for the Washington Post? … Concealed coal lobbyists running an anti-Teal campaign … More corruption busting for Stinging Nettle … The litigation industry spawned by Lehrmann ... Read on >> 

The eagle cracked

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Party time for Dicey ... Heydon's book - a pathway to rehabilitation ... The predatory man and the clever intellect - all wrapped up in the one person ... Academic tome and cancel agenda ... Despite the plaudits the record of abuse doesn't vanish ... Book launch with young associates at a safe distance ... Procrustes thinks out loud ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

Governance turmoil at Tiny Town Law Society ... Night of the long knives ... Lakeside in Canberra ... ACT Law Society upheaval over governance changes ... Bodies carted out of the council room ... Blood on the carpet ... Fraught litigation another distraction ... From Gang Gang ... Read more >> 

"One wonders whether a murderer who later contributes to society might be treated better that Heydon has been." 

Janet Albrechtsen in The Australian seeking the resurrection of former justice Dyson Heydon whose sexual predations ruined the legal careers of young women associates at the High Court ... April 11, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from Rome ... Judges on strike ... Too much "reform" ... Berlusconi legacy ... Referendum on the way ... Constitutional court inflames the Meloni regime with decision on boat people ... Insults galore ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Tea is for Tippy ... Life of a tiffstaff ... Bright, ambitious and, when it comes to the crucial things, hopeless ... Milking the glory of the gig ...  Introducing Tippy, our new blogger filing from within the concrete cage at Queens Square ... From Justinian's Archive, March 15, 2010 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Voices from on High | Main | Postcard from Paris »
Wednesday
Mar082023

Unclean Bill of Health

Victoria's plan for centralised health records ... Compulsory opt-in ... No opt-out ... Human rights and privacy concerns ... Potential leakage of sensitive personal details ... Digital records of the unhealthy ... Hugh Vuillier reports from Yarraside 

Patients not given a choice whether their medical information is shared across the Victorian health system

A Bill to create a centralised health record recently landed in the Victorian parliament and is expected soon to receive vice-regal consent. 

The Health Legislation Amendment (Information Sharing) Bill 2023 provides for medical details to be electronically shared across the state's health agencies. It has no opt-out provision and no avenue for Freedom of Information requests. 

Needless to say, it has been criticised by all-and-sundry, including the Opposition.

In her second reading speech, the health minister, Mary-Anne Thomas, argued that a unified access point for patients' health information would help save lives and improve patients' care, particularly in emergencies.  

Both Government and Opposition have acknowledged the need for improved record-keeping in healthcare. The proposed system will replace fragmentation of medical records still reliant on fax and phone.  

The new database will include Victorian's health conditions from the last three years - including allergies, injuries, physical and mental diagnoses. 

The decision to implement the database follows a recommendation from an independent report commissioned by the government in 2015, prompted by several infant deaths at Bacchus Marsh Hospital. 

The Law Institute of Victoria has raised concerns about the lack of an opt-out option, noting that sensitive personal information will be stored without patient consent. The institute's president Tania Wolff goes on:

"Patients must have the right to say who can access their health information - even if this means their health information will not be shared under the scheme. Patient autonomy is a fundamental human right: it's the same principle that allows a patient to refuse medical treatment."

Similar issues arose with the federally-funded My Health Records, leading to the implementation of an opt-out model in 2018. 2.5 million people withdrew from the scheme, including 10 percent of Victorians.  

Critics of the Bill also point to the risk of unauthorised disclosure of sensitive information, including mental health diagnosis, sexually transmitted conditions, and past domestic abuse.

During debates in the Legislative Assembly on February 22, Liberal MP David Southwick suggested that such a centralised database may deter patients from using healthcare services - each time a person used the Richmond injecting room, their visit was added to their medical record. 

Liberty Victoria has criticised the scheme for creating a "honeypot" of personal data vulnerable to cyber-intrusions. 

In 2019, the Auditor-General Andrew Greaves uncovered vulnerabilities in the health systems of state departments and major health care providers - including the health technology system within the Department of Health, which was found to be susceptible to "basic password cracking techniques". 

Although the Bill introduces three new criminal offences to deal specifically with unauthorised access, critics believe these measures to be of limited use, pointing to section 134ZS of the Bill which specifically excludes any Freedom of Information requests with regard to the proposed system. 

Looming behind this project lies the failure of HealthSMART, a previous attempt to overhaul the IT systems within the Victorian health system. 

Originally introduced by a Labor government in 2003, the project was later scrapped by the Coalition in 2012 due to delays and significant overspending. 

As the Second Reading debates began in the Legislative Council on March 7, LIV, Liberty Victoria and Digital Rights Watch issued a joint statement to implore upper house members to incorporate an opt-out provision in the Bill. 

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.