Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

The Financial Times examines criminal trial delays in England & Wales ... About 70,000 cases on waiting lists at Crown Courts ... More >>

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Tokyo Trial | Main | Report from Hong Kong »
Thursday
Jun032021

Knees-up at the ALRC

The Australian Law Reform Commission sends not so happy greetings on the birthday of the Corporations Act ... Mother, father and son in dialogue ... The youngster had put on weight, lost his way, hasn't caught up ... The commission tries new methods to draw attention ... Janek Drevikovsky reports 

The Australian Law Reform Commission knows how to put on a party - which is just as well, because the Corporations Act, which turns 20 this year, deserves nothing less. 

To inaugurate the Act's third decade, the Commission let its hair down as only a bunch of policy wonks could: with a ‘light-hearted dialogue in which a discontented mother and father implore their son (the Corporations Act) to grow up". 

It beats writing law reform reports, which governments usually toss into the dust bin. This we found buried in ALRC "news" bulletins: 

Father: Son, this year you're turning 20 years old. Your mother and I are proud of you – you've achieved a lot: a nationally consistent regulation of basic company law, insolvency, financial markets, products and services, among so much else. However, we are concerned about you. You need to grow up.

The first problem, we hear, is the Corporation's Act ballooning waistline: 

Mother: Your father and I remember when you were just 1866 pages long. You've grown a lot since then, but don't you think you should slow down a bit? You've really been bulking up.

Father: I can barely get my arms around your primary provisions without opening 6 PDFs on the Federal Register of Legislation! Your brother, the ASIC Act 2001 (Cth), only put on 232 pages in the same time period. 

This is not just about fat-shaming a piece of legislation, entertaining as that may be. There's a half-hidden reform suggestion: 

Mother: Maybe it's time you gave up insolvency and financial markets regulation, and left them for other Acts to focus on. Please give it some thought.

The Act's problems - and bad habits - don't stop there: 

Father: We're worried you might be addicted to legislative and other instruments. You can't just keep putting an instrument on the parts of yourself you don't like. We barely recognise the boy we raised! 

Corporations Act: [Speaking for the first time.] Whatever. Everyone's using instruments these days. You just don't understand ...

Father: I was vacuuming the other day and found over 366 legislative instruments under your bed, and a box of thousands of individual relief instruments. Why are you hiding these from us? We looked on the Federal Register of Legislation and found that many of them weren't on there. How are people meant to find the law? 

And, like many Gen Z post-adolescents, the Act is simply bamboozling to its elders: 

Father: Son, I'm sure you think using all this elaborate language is really cool, but a mark of maturity is expressing yourself clearly. No one talks like you in the real world. We think it's time you were a little clearer.

Mother: You really do need to keep up with technology. Why are you still requiring directors to execute documents on a single, hard copy? And requiring meetings to be conducted in person, rather than digitally? You're falling behind the other kids.

Even people who teach the Act, like Melbourne University law academic Cally Jordan, don't have nice things to say: 

Mother: Your teacher, Cally Jordan, said your class-mates thought you were "unlovely and unloved".

Some big changes are needed, if the Corps Act wants to flourish as an adult: 

Father: It's time you took a good hard look at your definitions and considered consolidating them, using them consistently, and making them clearer. And it's time to consider your legislative design – how you're using regulations and instruments, and how they can be made more accessible.

Mother: And it's time you ensured that you are clearer about what you're trying to achieve, so that your intent is actually realised.

And, just in case anyone - anyone - in government is paying attention: 

Mother: Perhaps you should talk to the ALRC, son? I hear they've got some ideas ...

Readers who have followed the thread will be relieved to know that "no feelings of the Corporations Act were harmed in [the dialogue's] production". 

If the dialogue authors, William Isdale and Nicholas Simoes da Silva, both ALRC legal officers, ever find themselves at a loose end they could start work on Corporations Act - The Musical

You're almost 20, Corporations Act

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.