Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

The Financial Times examines criminal trial delays in England & Wales ... About 70,000 cases on waiting lists at Crown Courts ... More >>

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« National Treasure | Main | Knees-up at the ALRC »
Wednesday
Jun232021

Tokyo Trial

The post WW11 tribunal that tried the Japanese leadership ... Inventing crimes after the event ... Eleven judges wrestle with the complexities over three years ... Egos muddled with legal principles ... Miss Lumière reviews the Netflix mini-series on Japanese war crimes 

Japanese Premier Hideki Tojo - executed after trial by the IMTFE

War crimes were very much in the cold Sydney air (and in court 18D) when Miss Lumière tuned into watch Tokyo Trial, a richly dramatised account of how a panel of international jurists put alleged Japanese war criminals on trial in the immediate aftermath of World War 11.

Oh what a lovely war it's not. 

Rather, Tokyo Trial succeeds in making riveting drama (and heaps of intellectual hay) from the nearly three years it took for eleven judges comprising the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) to determine the culpability of the Japanese leadership and their appropriate punishments.

This fascinating, sometimes harrowing four-part series was co- produced by Japan's public broadcaster NHK in collaboration with the Netherlands and Canada.

It is surprisingly good, and not just because it traverses the moral high ground as well as the political low ground.

Tokyo Trial manages to make a whole lot of legal argument interesting because it cleverly focuses on the individual characters of the judges, who hail from wildly varying jurisdictions.

Led by Australian High Court Justice Sir William Webb (a stiffly sour performance by Jonathan Hyde) the IMTFE proves to be the perfect arena for a clash of cultures and egos.

Looming largest in the ego department (aside from Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers US General Douglas MacArthur) is the Scottish judge Lord William Patrick (Paul Freeman), who sees his task as straightforward; simply follow the precedent set by the Nuremburg trials in 1946.

In the other corner is India's Radhabinod Pal (Irrfan Khan) fired with the zeal of his country's imminent independence and keen to test the boundaries of colonialism. 

High Court justice Sir William Webb, from Queensland, President of the Military Tribunal for the Far East

Pal maintained that the "new" Nuremburg war crimes - of aggression, against peace and against humanity - should not be applied retrospectively and that the tribunal was driven by revenge, not justice.

In the centre is the humanist Bert Röling (an empathetic Marcel Hensema) from the Netherlands, who begins by questioning the tribunal's charter, vacillates about applying Nuremburg law and finally ends up supporting the death penalty.

Also in the middle, but clearly aligned with the US representative (Tim Ahern as a very chiselled Major General Myron C. Cramer) and UK are NZ  Supreme Court Justice Sir Erima Northcroft (Julian Wadham sporting a less than convincing accent), Canadian judge Edward McDougall and French colonial jurist Henri Bernard.

China's Mei Ju-ao (David Tse) and The Philippines' Delfin Jaranilla (Bert Matias) come to the table bearing the all too fresh scars of recent Japanese invasion and brutality in their homelands.

Kestutis Jakstas gives an amusing performance as Russia's roughneck Red Army tribunal member, General Zaryanov. 

It's a heady, complex mix of politics and personality, all played out against the utter destruction wreaked upon Japan by the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, surely one the greatest war crimes ever committed.

Tokyo Trial's co-directors, Pieter Verhoeff and Rob W. King make liberal use of archival footage, brilliantly melding scratchy black and white images of the actual trial with film of the actors.

While private doubts and jockeying for influence feature in many of the discussions between the judges, what is at stake is always perfectly clear; nothing less than the future of the "civilised world".

Of course we know what happened in the end: justice was seen to have been done (if one ignores the fact that Emperor Hirohito got way scot-free).

The perpetrators, both military and political, were either executed or imprisoned, the Nuremburg and Tokyo tribunals served as precursors to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, and world peace ensued ... sort of.

Tokyo Trial is streaming now on Netflix.

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.